Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Why not work with the MACC instead of just working concurrently with them?

“Although we are not referring any of our cases to the MACC, we are working concurrently with them. And, maybe, they are investigating some of these cases as well. We don’t know,” Umno Disciplinary Board member and Umno Legal Adviser Datuk Mohd Hafarizam Harun informed.

Read Umno money pushers hemmed-in by board and MACC

Is the UMNO Disciplinary Board's action or shall we say omission of not submitting or referring cases, which are currently being investigated by them but not under the radar of the MACC, amounting to withholding of material evidence of possible criminal offenses committed especially under Section 10(b)(aa) of the Anti-Corruption Act 1997? I wonder.

As such, should the board instead of just working concurrently with the MACC; start to work WITH the commission? If you ask me, I'd say it's high time that they do so.


Read also Small Talk's Rasuah Politik vs Rasuah SPRM

Updated 28th Jan 2009 - 2.59pm

3 comments:

kluangman said...

Dalam soal menyedapkan telinga mendengar, kita kagum dengan penjelasan Lembaga Disiplin UMNO, tapi dari segi perlaksanaan khususnya melibatkan ikan jerung - jawapannya hampeh.

Caustic Dude said...

Yang Arif Tuan Loyar Kampung,

Saya ingin tahu kenapa ada MACC. Adakah BPR sudah tutup kedai? Adakah BPR tak mampu menangani rasuah di negara kita? Ataupun MACC ini adalah hasil 'rebranding exercise' seperti Ban Islam, maksud saya Bank Islam yang menelan berjuta-juta lemon hanya untuk membuat logo dan 'billboard' baru tapi hasilnya masih di takuk lama.

Apa yang MACC boleh buat tapi BPR dulu tiada kuasa/kemampuan nak buat?

Sekian terima kasih.

-CD-

Lawyer Kampung said...

Kluangman, depa dalam mode "pelan-pelan kayuh" kot? ;-)

Bro CD, itulah hasil kerja kalau dibuat last minute. Make-up lebih, natural beauty none.. ;-)